We’ve all heard about the latest smart phones that let you talk to the sky and control drones.
But the big one we haven’t heard much about is a satellite communication system.
There are currently three main contenders.
One is called the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket.
It’s a single-engine rocket that’s capable of launching a satellite up to 200km into space, but is more expensive than other rockets.
But it’s still more than a quarter of the price of a comparable satellite.
The other two are the Boeing 777-200 and Boeing 777X.
Both are reusable rocket boosters that can land and re-enter the atmosphere.
They’re also more expensive.
The 777X, which is also reusable, can be launched for $20 million.
Both the 777 and 777X are capable of high-altitude flights, but their missions aren’t designed to be long-duration missions.
What they’re designed for is when they can take off, fly to a destination and then return home.
And the 777-300 is the more expensive of the three.
It has a much larger rocket and payload, and it can be deployed to more distant targets.
Boeing’s 777X has a range of more than 1,200km, and its satellites can be targeted to take off at up to 6,000km.
But Boeing is selling it for $4 billion.
The problem with the 777X is that it can’t be launched to a location that’s more than 300km away from the launch site, as is required for the 777’s longer-range missions.
That means it’s more expensive to launch it to a place that’s farther from the launching site, so it won’t be useful for long-range surveillance missions.
So what’s the best satellite communications system for long range surveillance missions?
The 777-400, which Boeing introduced in 2010.
Boeing 777s can also carry satellites and payload to up to 600km, but its payloads are much heavier than the 777s.
This is because its rockets are designed to land and be re-entered on a parachute at a far higher altitude.
That way, the payloads don’t need to be recharged.
So a satellite or payload can be delivered to a target, then returned to its launch site with a parachute, as it were.
The company says its 777-500 has a maximum range of 2,000 kilometres, and Boeing is using it in a number of its long-distance surveillance satellites.
Its payload can also be used for surveillance of aircraft, though it doesn’t have the same capability as the 777.
Boeing is also using its 777X in its long range space surveillance satellites for its X-Band Low Frequency constellation, which includes both the 777, and the 777 X. It can also deliver payloads for other countries, though the satellite’s capabilities are limited.
How much do satellite communications cost?
As of 2014, Boeing was the second-largest satellite communications provider in the world behind only Russia.
And its satellites are often used for data processing and other uses.
The Boeing 777, the 777x, and their successors have all cost more than $2 billion, but they’re still less expensive than some of the other satellites.
For example, the 737 Max is priced at $3.9 billion, and that’s a fraction of the cost of the SpaceX rockets.
The 737 Max costs $2.2 billion to launch and can carry around 800kg of payload.
But that’s compared to the 777 x, which can carry 400kg.
The next cheapest satellite communications satellites are the Arianespace satellites that are designed for small, remote sensing satellites, such as those in the U.S. and Europe.
They are about $1 billion each.
The Arianescope E-8s, which are in the Avanti constellation, are the smallest satellites available.
They can carry only about 80kg of satellites.
They have a payload of around 100kg.
What is the most expensive satellite communications device?
The most expensive is the Lockheed Martin C-130 Hercules transport plane, which has a price tag of $6.6 billion.
It was first used to transport troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.
That’s a lot of money, but it’s also more than the cost for the current most expensive device, the Boeing 737 Max.
In fact, it’s a good deal more expensive, at around $1.7 billion.
That doesn’t include the cost to buy the new 747-8 and 777-700 aircraft, which will be larger and more powerful than the C-Hanger.
The Airbus A380, which makes the A380’s seat, has a cost of $8.5 billion.
And it’s the most complex aircraft in the fleet.
It uses eight separate aircraft.
But if you were to buy two of them, you’d still have to pay for a new Boeing 777 X, which costs around $7.8 billion.
How do you tell